Question

【題目】 I'm a single person and live with my dog. Jed isn't just my dog. He is my family. He goes everywhere with me. So I was overjoyed last year to hear that Bunnings was allowing dogs on a leash(皮帶)- into their stores.

But no sooner had the rule come in than it was quickly repealed(撤銷). A little girl in Victoria had walked up to a Jack Russell in a store and been bitten(咬傷). That was it. No more dogs.

I don't know the whole story. But here's what I have to say: dogs bite sometimes and kids are sometimes difficult to control.

There is nothing I love more than a kid who wants to touch Jed. But what's even better is when they ask permission first.

I was at my local dog park last week. It's huge, with an off-leash dog area to one side and a fenced-off kids' playground a good distance away. There was a family there that morning —parents and two young girls playing near the dog area. The elder girl started crying at the sight of Jed—“puppy! There a puppy! "Jed went right up and started licking(舔)her, which only made her cry louder.

My dog was frightened and tried to get away. The little girl ran after him, shouting loudly. The parents did nothing; they just let their kid frighten my dog and then said I should have stopped him from licking her.

While they had a choice to play elsewhere, I did not. So I had to walk Jed away.

“I just don't want to have to meet a dog when I go shopping," said one caller on a radio show yesterday. Look, I get that. But the thing is, I don't always want to have your kid kick the back of my seat for two hours on a plane.

When I lived in the UK and the US, I couldn't walk through the stores without stopping to pat dogs. Why can't we follow their practice?

【1】What do we know about Jed?

A.He is a troublemaker.

B.He means a lot to the author.

C.He is the author's only friend.

D.He often goes shopping with: the author.

【2】Why did Bunnings stop following the rule?

A.A girl lost her dog there.

B.Dogs were badly-behaved.

C.Most people were against it.

D.It wanted to keep its customers safe.

【3】What happened at the dog park?

A.The little girl was hurt.

B.Jed was treated unfairly.

C.Jed played happily with the girl.

D.The parents stopped their daughter.

【4】What does the author think of the caller's words?

A.Meaningless.B.Hurtful.C.Reasonable.D.Touching.

Answer 1

【答案】

【1】B

【2】D

【3】B

【4】B

【解析】

這是一篇夾敘夾議文。文章主要從作者自身經(jīng)歷出發(fā)，表達了作者對于社會上對待動物的不公平現(xiàn)象的看法。

【1】細節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)第一段中Jed isn't just my dog. He is my family.（杰德不僅僅是我的狗。他是我的家人。）可知杰德對作者來說意義重大。故選B。

【2】細節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)第二段But no sooner had the rule come in than it was quickly repealed. A little girl in Victoria had walked up to a Jack Russell in a store and been bitten. That was it. No more dogs.（但這條規(guī)定剛一實施就很快被廢除了。維多利亞州的一個小女孩在一家商店里走向一只杰克羅素犬，結(jié)果被咬了。就這樣。不能有狗進商店了。）可知Bunnings停止遵守這一規(guī)定，因為它想保證顧客的安全。故選D。

【3】細節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)第六段My dog was frightened and tried to get away. The little girl ran after him, shouting loudly. The parents did nothing; they just let their kid frighten my dog and then said I should have stopped him from licking her.（我的狗嚇壞了，想逃跑。小女孩在他后面跑，大聲喊叫。父母什么也沒做;他們只是讓他們的孩子嚇唬我的狗，然后說我應(yīng)該阻止他舔她。）可知在狗公園杰德受到了不公平的待遇。故選B。

【4】推理判斷題。根據(jù)倒數(shù)第二段“I just don't want to have to meet a dog when I go shopping," said one caller on a radio show yesterday. Look, I get that. But the thing is, I don't always want to have your kid kick the back of my seat for two hours on a plane.（“我只是不想在購物時遇到一只狗，”昨天在一個廣播節(jié)目中，一位打電話的人說。我明白了。但是問題是，我并不想讓你的孩子在飛機上花兩個小時踢我的座椅靠背。）可推知作者認為打電話的人的話語很傷人。故選B。

細節(jié)理解題大多是根據(jù)文章中的具體信息如事實、例證、原因、過程、論述等進行提問的。抓住文段中的事實和細節(jié)是做好該題型的關(guān)鍵，也是做好其它類型問題的基礎(chǔ)。該題型幾乎都可以在文章中直接找到與答案有關(guān)的信息，或是其變體。在一篇短文里大部分篇幅都屬于這類圍繞主體展開的細節(jié)。做這類題一般采用尋讀法，即先讀題，然后帶著問題快速閱讀短文，找出與問題和選項有關(guān)的詞語或句子，再對相關(guān)部分進行分析對比，找出答案。正確選項雖然一般不是原文照搬，但是一般是原文的改寫，意思不變。如換一個同義詞，把否定改為肯定，把肯定改為否定等。如第一小題，根據(jù)第一段中Jed isn't just my dog. He is my family.（杰德不僅僅是我的狗。他是我的家人。）可知杰德對作者來說意義重大。故選B。