Question

【題目】As early as the mid-18th century, some people began raising doubts about Marco Polo’s travels. In 1995, historian Frances Wood argued in her book Did Marco Polo Go to China? that the famous explorer from Venice never made it to pass the Black Sea. She noted that his travel journal left out the Great Wall of China, chopsticks and tea drinking among other details. Furthermore, Chinese documents from Polo’s day made no mention of the explorer and his men.

Wood and other scholars have argued that Marco Polo based his tales of China on information collected from fellow trades who had actually been there. Last year, a team of Italian researchers became the latest to challenge Polo’s accounts(敘述). They said that evidence didn’t support his description of Kublai Khan’s Japanese invasions (侵略）.

Now, however, research by Hans Ulrich Vogel of Germany’s Tubingen University might help prove Marco Polo was true. In a new book Marco Polo Was in China，the professor of Chinese history tries to prove that Marco Polo spoke the truth. He suggests, for example, that Polo didn’t include the Great Wall in his book because it only achieved its great importance in the Ming Dynasty several hundred years later. Vogel further explains that Chinese records from the 13th and 14th centuries avoided setting down visits from Westerners.

Historians before him have touched on these issues. But Vogel also relies on another evidence:the explorer’s very detailed descriptions of currency and salt production in the Yuan Dynasty. According to Vogel, Polo documented these aspects of Mongol Chinese culture in greater detail than any other of his time. This is a hint (暗示) that Polo relied on his own powers of observation.

Will we ever know whether Marco Polo traveled to China? Perhaps not, but the consequences of his real or fictional journey are still felt across the globe. One reader of The Travels of Marco Polo was Christopher Columbus, who stepped upon the New World while following his idol’s footsteps.

【1】France Wood doubted Marco Polo’s travel’s to China because his description ________.

A. missed some important culture of China

B. covered so much about traders’ life

C. was full of obvious mistakes

D. seemed less detailed

【2】Vogel’s trust on Marco Polo is based on the argument that ________.

a. The Great Wall didn’t gain its importance then

b. Records in the Yuan Dynasty mentioned Polo

c. Polo mentioned the currency and salt

d. Polo’s other works are believable

e. Polo recorded what he saw in great detail

A. a, b, dB. a, c, dC. a, e D. b, c

【3】Which of the following shows the structure of the text?（P1為第一段，以此類推）

Answer 1

【答案】

【1】A

【2】C

【3】B

【解析】

試題分析: 本文對馬可波羅是否來過中國進行了探究。有人認為馬可波羅沒來過中國，因為他遺漏了中國很多重要的文化標志；有人則相信馬可波羅來過中國，因為他對細節(jié)描述的如此詳細。但不管他有沒有來過中國，他的游記的影響在全世界都可以感覺得到，比如哥倫布就是看了他的游記踏上尋找新世界的旅程的。

【1】A 細節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)文中第一段中的She noted that his travel journal left out the Great Wall of China, chopsticks and tea drinking among other details. Furthermore, Chinese documents from Polo’s day made no mention of the explorer and his men.可知，France Wood之所以懷疑馬可波羅是否到過中國旅行是因為她注意到他的游記遺漏了長城，筷子和飲茶，以及其他細節(jié)；此外，中國的文件中也沒有提到這位探險家和他的人。故選A。

【2】C 細節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)文中第三段后半部分Polo didn’t included the Great Wall in his book because it only achieved its great importance under the Ming Dynasty, several hundred years later. Vogel further explains that Chinese records from the 13th and 14th centuries routinely avoided setting down visits from Westerners.可知，Vogel之所以相信馬可波羅是因為長城在幾百年之后，也就是明代才有了它的重要性。而且他進一步認為，中國的記錄，從第十三和第十四世紀經常掩蓋西方使節(jié)訪問。故選C。