Question

  [2015山東泰安二模] Robots make me nervous―especially the ones which seem to think for them?selves. I was embarrassed to admit this till I heard that Bill Gates,the founder of Mi?crosoft,felt the same way. Gates said in an interview with the website Reddit:"I am in the camp that is concerned a-bout super intelligence. First the machines will do a lot of jobs for us and not be super intelligent. That should be positive if we manage well. A few decades after that though the intelligence is strong enough to be a concern." Well,maybe I don't have to worry about my laptop and kitchen appliances yet. After I use them I can always pull the plug. But in the future,machines might find a way to prevent us from switching them off. There's a scary thought!Professor Stephen Hawking warned a few months ago about the possibility that artificial intelligence could evolve and end up beyond human control. He suggested that ma?chines could "spell the end of the human race".

  Maybe the problem with computers too clever for us is not that they are evil or rebellious. What could put us in danger is that they might be too efficient. That's what phi?losopher Nick Bostrom from the Future of Humanity In?stitute at Oxford University believes. He says that ma?chines are indifferent to humans and in pursuit of their own goals,the destruction of people might be just collater?al (附帶的〉damage. A machine would not take pity on you.

  I'm glad my machines at home are "dumb". All my vacuum cleaner wants to take over is the carpet in my liv?ing room. Let's hope they don't create an appliance which wants to take over the world!

24. We can conclude from Gates' statements that       .

   A. he is embarrassed that he is afraid of robots

   B. he doesn't think machines are intelligent

   C. machines should be fully employed

   D. machines' super intelligence should be a concern 

25.The underlined word "spell" in Paragraph 3 is closest in meaning to "      ".

   A. record   B. cause

   C. explain   D. develop 

26. Why are computers dangerous according to Nick Bostrom?

   A. They are too evil and rebellious.

   B. They are indifferent to humans.

   C. They show pity on humans.

   D. They are too clever and efficient.

27. What can be inferred about the author?

   A. He doesn't agree with Bill Gates.

   B. He is not content with the present kitchen appli?ances.

   C. He is scared about the super intelligence of ma-chm cs.

   D. He expects that machines will take place of hu?mans.

Answer 1

[文章大意]本文是一篇議論文。作者在文中表達(dá)了自己對(duì)未來(lái)的人工智能機(jī)器人的擔(dān)憂。 24. D推理判斷題。根據(jù)第一段中的"'lam in the camp that is concerned about super intelligence."'可知，蓋茨也擔(dān)心未來(lái)的機(jī)器可能具有的高智能，故答案為D.

25. B詞義猜測(cè)題。根據(jù)前面的end up beyond human control 可知，本句的意思是"這些機(jī)器可能導(dǎo)致人類的滅亡"，故答案B.

26. D細(xì)節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)倒數(shù)第二段中的"Maybe the problem with computers too clever for us is not that they are evil or rebellious. What could put us in danger is that they might be too efficient."可知，Nick認(rèn)為未來(lái)機(jī)器的危險(xiǎn)性在于它們太聰明、太高效了。故答案為D.

27. C推理判斷題。根據(jù)最后一段可知，作者害怕機(jī)器的高智能。故答案為C.