18．As a Fulbright（富布萊特法案基金）scholar at Yale，I wanted very much to get some individual help from some famous professors，but their office-hours were only once a week and there were always students waiting outside．At first，I was too polite to get their help．Then I realized that Chinese politeness does not work in this society．I needed to be aggressive to get what I wanted．I also noticed that Chinese students or Asian students were very polite in class while American students often interrupted the professor，asking questions and dominating the discussion．The Chinese students were not as aggressive as American students．
I was impressed by the role of the professor in the class．The professor didn't act as an authority，giving final conclusions，but as a researcher looking for answers to questions together with the students．One linguistic feature of his interacting with his students was that he used many modal verbs-far more than I did in Beiwai．When answering questions，he usually said："this is my personal opinion and it could be wrong．It would be a good idea if you could read the book I mentioned the other day．"Or，"You may find the book I recommended helpful．"Or，"You could be right，but you might find this point of view also interesting．"When making comments on students'performances，the professor usually said："It might have been much clearer if you had taken in some of the ideas we discussed earlier this semester．"
In China，authorities are always supposed to give wise decisions and correct directions．Therefore students always expect the professor to give an answer to the question．I still remember how annoyed they were when foreign teachers did not provide such an answer．Their expectations from authorities are much higher than those of American students．Once the Chinese students got the answer，they were sure about it．That is why they make far more certain statement than American students．That is why Chinese students find it difficult to use modal verbs because the function of modal verbs is to provide room for negotiation and different ideas．
1．The American professors use many modal verbs because they want toD．
A．argue with their students
B．be more sure about their answers
C．express their ideas more clearly
D．develop their students'own way of thinking
2．Which of the following statements best expresses the author's idea？D
A．Chinese professors can always give correct answer to the question．
B．American professors are not responsible since they don't give students answers．
C．American education produces aggressive students．
D．Education in China is not helpful in developing students'creativity．
3．Which of the following methods did the author mainly employ in developing the article？A
A．Comparison and contrast．
B．Cause and effect．
C．Giving examples．
D．Description．
4．What is the author's attitude towards education in U．S．？C
A．Positive
B．Negative
C．Neutral
D．Unsure．
分析 本文是一篇人生感悟類閱讀，屬于記敘文，主要講述了美國教授使用許多情態(tài)動詞，因為他們想要發(fā)展學生的獨立的思維方式，以及中美教育的區(qū)別．
解答 1．D．推理判斷題．根據The professor didn't act as an authority，giving final conclusions，but as a researcher looking for answers to questions together with the students．One linguistic feature of his interacting with his students was that he used many modal verbs-far more than I did in Beiwai．可以推測出，美國教授使用許多情態(tài)動詞，因為他們想要發(fā)展學生的獨立的思維方式．故選D．
2．D．細節(jié)理解題．結合上下文，根據That is why Chinese students find it difficult to use modal verbs because the function of modal verbs is to provide room for negotiation and different ideas．可知，作者認為中國的教育方式不利于學生的創(chuàng)造力．故選D．
3．A．推理判斷題．根據文章內容可知，文章是通過美國和中國教育方式的對比和比較來發(fā)展的．故選A．
4．C．推理判斷題．根據文章內容可知，作者對于美國的教育是很客觀地評價，是中立的態(tài)度．故選C．
點評 本文是一篇人生感悟類閱讀，題目涉及多道主旨大意題，細節(jié)理解題，推理判斷題．做題時學生應仔細閱讀原文，把握文章主要內容，聯系文章上下文內容并結合所給選項含義，從中選出正確答案，一定要做到有理有據，切忌胡亂猜測．
