Question

第二節(jié)：書面表達（滿分25分）

最近，關(guān)于“高中是否該取消文理分科”的網(wǎng)上調(diào)查吸引了26萬余網(wǎng)民的積極參與。

	贊同文理分科（46%）	不贊同文理分科（54%）
理由	如不分科，文、理都要學(xué)，增加了學(xué)生負擔。	如分科，學(xué)生知識面窄， 不利于學(xué)生的發(fā)展。

請根據(jù)所給的信息寫一篇英文報道，描述被調(diào)查者的不同看法，并表明你的看法。

注意：詞數(shù)120左右，文章開頭已給出（不計入詞數(shù)）。

Recently more than 260,000 netizens have participated in the survey about whether the curriculum of senior high school should be divided into arts and science。            

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Answer 1

One possible version:

Recently more than 260,000 netizens have participated in the survey about whether the curriculum (課程) of senior high school should be divided into arts and science.

    About 46% of the netizens are in favor of the idea that the curriculum should be divided into arts and science. Otherwise, students may have too much to learn, which increases their burden greatly. However, about 54% of the netizens think that it is unwise to get arts and science separated. They believe that it is not good for students' full development and that they may have a narrow knowledge.

    In my opinion, the problem does not lie in whether the curriculum should be divided or not. Actually, some students spend their time and energy mostly on either arts or science, which may have a bad effect on their future. So I would like to suggest that the college entrance examination should be reformed.