Question

Should students do the grading?

The Supreme Court says the practice doesn’t violate(侵犯) a student’s right to privacy, but is it right for students to grade one another?

Walter Potenza, California

The Supreme Court was absolutely correct to say it’s OK for students to grade one another’s homework, quizzes, and tests: in fact, it’s a great idea.

By grading one another’s papers and seeing the problems their classmates have, students double their exposure(暴露) to the troubles that they may meet on future exams and tests. Grading one another’s papers may be one of the best ways for students to reinforce within themselves the ways to master the most difficult parts of what they are learning.

Teachers are underappreciated and underpaid for the number of hours they have to work to be able to teach really well. Grading all their students’ papers can take hours. Some of that time and energy can be saved by spending a few minutes in class, while providing an extremely valuable learning experience.

I understand that some individuals are sensitive to their classmates seeing their work or grades. Any good teacher would be considerate of students who don’t want their classmates to grade their assignments.

Winston Smith, North Carolina

A girl moves back as her classmate announces her failing test grade and hands her the paper. The quiet classroom heats up.

With the increase in student grading over the past few years, scenes like this have become a bitter reality in schools across the nation. Teachers and schools should not advocate student grading and public announcement of grades because it provides a violation of privacy for students and causes unfair judgments and treatment by their classmates.

Since 1974, a law known as the Buckley Amendment has forbidden the release of education records in order to protect the privacy of students and their families. I strongly disagree with the Court’ s ruling that this law does not include student grading.

I can think of no greater violation of privacy than the exposure of one’s personal information to a group of peers(同齡人). This can be very embarrassing. Releasing this sort of personal information should be avoided, especially by institutions that seek to provide a supportive environment during essential years of human development.

1.The underlined word “reinforce” has the same meaning as “_________”.

A. change     B. imagine     C. strengthen       D. create

2.Walter Potenza suggests that ______________.

A. teachers should set aside some time to grade students’ papers

B. the Supreme Court should do more research on students grading

C. teachers should guide students on how to grade homework

D. teachers should be careful not to hurt those sensitive students

3.By mentioning the example of a girl, Winston Smith wants to ____________.

A. show her weak points

B. criticize the student grader

C. tell us she is not a good student

D. present the negative effect of student grading

4.What does Winston Smith seem to agree?

A. Student grading is not related to families’ privacy.

B. The Supreme Court should change its decision.

C. The Buckley Amendment doesn’t apply to student grading.

D. Student grading is OK, but not public announcement of grades.

 

Answer 1

【答案】

 

1.C

2.D

3.D

4.B

【解析】

試題分析：文章介紹了在學(xué)校里面老師讓學(xué)生之間相互批改試卷引起了社會(huì)很大的關(guān)注，最高法院宣布，學(xué)生之間相互批改試卷并沒(méi)有侵犯學(xué)生的隱私，也從正反兩個(gè)反面論述了不同的觀點(diǎn)，Walter Potenza, California支持讓學(xué)生之間相互批改，并說(shuō)出了其中的好處，而Winston Smith, North Carolina是反對(duì)這一做法的，說(shuō)出了這一做法對(duì)學(xué)生的負(fù)面影響。

1.C詞義推測(cè)題。Grading one another’s papers may be one of the best ways for students to reinforce within themselves the ways to master the most difficult parts of what they are learning.句意為：讓學(xué)生去批改別人的試卷是讓學(xué)生加強(qiáng)他們?cè)谡n堂上學(xué)到的最困難的部分的最好方法。由此句可知reinforce的最佳理解是加強(qiáng)的意思，加強(qiáng)他們?cè)谡n堂上學(xué)到的東西。change vt改變，改換；imagine vt想象，設(shè)想；create vt創(chuàng)作，創(chuàng)造。故答案應(yīng)為C。

2.D細(xì)節(jié)理解題。A girl moves back as her classmate announces her failing test grade and hands her the paper. The quiet classroom heats up.句意為：一個(gè)女孩兒移到了后面，當(dāng)她的同學(xué)宣布她的失敗的分?jǐn)?shù)，把她的試卷給她的時(shí)候，安靜的教室沸騰了起來(lái)。在這種情況下，會(huì)傷到一個(gè)學(xué)生的自尊，所以是在建議老師應(yīng)該注意這種情況不要去傷害那些很敏感的學(xué)生，故答案應(yīng)為D。

3.D細(xì)節(jié)理解題。A girl moves back as her classmate announces her failing test grade and hands her the paper. The quiet classroom heats up. With the increase in student grading over the past few years, scenes like this have become a bitter reality in schools across the nation. Teachers and schools should not advocate student grading and public announcement of grades because it provides a violation of privacy for students and causes unfair judgments and treatment by their classmates.句意為：在過(guò)去的幾年里，隨著學(xué)生之間相互批改作業(yè)現(xiàn)象的增加，象這個(gè)小女孩的情況在全國(guó)的學(xué)校里已成了痛苦的現(xiàn)實(shí)，老師和學(xué)校不應(yīng)該主張學(xué)生之間相互批改作業(yè)公布分?jǐn)?shù)等。他認(rèn)為這是很痛苦的事情，所以是在呈現(xiàn)這一現(xiàn)象的負(fù)面影響。故答案應(yīng)為D。

4.B細(xì)節(jié)理解題。I strongly disagree with the Court’ s ruling that this law does not include student grading.句意為：我強(qiáng)烈的不同意，最高法院的這種關(guān)于學(xué)生評(píng)價(jià)的這種裁定，所以從此處是說(shuō)他認(rèn)為最高法院應(yīng)該改變他們的決定。

【考點(diǎn)】考查社會(huì)現(xiàn)象類(lèi)文章的閱讀理解。