Question

Mark Twain has been called the inventor of the American novel. And he surely deserves additional praise: the man who popularized the clever literary attack on racism.
I say clever because anti-slavery fiction had been the important part of the literature in the years before the Civil War. H. B. Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin is only the most famous example. These early stories dealt directly with slavery. With minor exceptions, Twain planted his attacks on slavery and prejudice into tales that were on the surface about something else entirely. He drew his readers into the argument by drawing them into the story.
Again and again, in the postwar years, Twain seemed forced to deal with the challenge of race. Consider the most controversial, at least today, of Twain’s novels, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Only a few books have been kicked off the shelves as often as Huckleberry Finn, Twain’s most widely read tale. Once upon a time, people hated the book because it struck the mass rude. Twain himself wrote that those who banned the book considered the novel “trash and suitable only for the slums”. More recently the book has been attacked because of the character Jim, the escaped slave, and many occurrences of the word nigger. (The term Nigger Jim, for which the novel is often severely criticized, never appears in it.)
But the attacks were and are silly—and miss the point. The novel is strongly anti-slavery. Jim’s search through the slave states for the family from whom he has been forcibly parted is heroic. As J. Chadwick has pointed out, the character of Jim was a first in American fiction — a recognition that the slave had two personalities, “the voice of survival within a white slave culture and the voice of the individual: Jim, the father and the man.”
There is much more. Twain’s mystery novel Pudd’nhead Wilson stood as a challenge to the racial beliefs of even many of the liberals of his day. Written at a time when the accepted wisdom held Negroes to be inferior to whites, especially in intelligence, Twain’s tale centered in part around two babies switched at birth. A slave gave birth to her master’s baby and, for fear that the child should be sold south, switched him for the master’s baby by his wife. The slave’s light-skinned child was taken to be white and grew up with both the attitudes and the education of the slave-holding class. The master’s wife’s baby was taken for black and grew up with the attitudes and intonations of the slave.
The point was difficult to miss: nurture, not nature, was the key to social status. The features of the black man that provided the stuff of prejudice—manner of speech, for example—were, to Twain, indicative of nothing other than the conditioning that slavery forced on its victims.
Twain’s racial was not perfect . One is left uneasy, for example, by the lengthy passage in his autobiography about how much he loved what were called “nigger shows” in his youth--mostly with white men performing in black-face---and his delight in getting his mother to laugh at them. Yet there is no reason to think Twain saw the shows as representing reality. His frequent attacks on slavery and prejudice suggest his keen awareness that they did not.
Was Twain a racist? Asking the questioning the 21st century is as wise as asking the same of Lincoln. If we read the words and attitudes of the past through the “wisdom” of the considered moral judgments of the present, we will find nothing but error. Lincoln, who believed the black man the inferior of the white, fought and won a war to free him. And Twain, raised in a slave state, briefly a soldier, and inventor of Jim, may have done more to anger the nation over racial injustice and awaken its collective conscience than any other novelist in the past century

1. 1.
   How do Twain’s novels on slavery differ from Stowes?
   1. A.
      Twain was more willing to deal with racism
   2. B.
      Twain’s attack on racism was much less open
   3. C.
      Twain’s themes seemed to agree with plots
   4. D.
      Twain was openly concerned with racism
2. 2.
   The story of two babies switched mainly indicates that                        
   1. A.
      slaves were forced to give up their babies to their masters
   2. B.
      slaves babies could pickup slave holders’ way of speaking
   3. C.
      blacks’ social position was shaped by how they were brought up
   4. D.
      blacks were born with certain features of prejudice
3. 3.
   What does the under lined word “they” in Paragraph 7 refer to?
   1. A.
      The attacks
   2. B.
      Slavery and prejudice
   3. C.
      White men
   4. D.
      The shows
4. 4.
   What does the author mainly argue for?
   1. A.
      Twain had done more than his contemporary writers to attack racism
   2. B.
      Twain was an admirable figure comparable to Abraham Lincoln
   3. C.
      Twain’s works had been banned on unreasonable grounds
   4. D.
      Twain s works should be read from a historical point of view

Answer 1

BCDA
試題分析：本文主要是對(duì)馬克吐溫及他幾部作品的評(píng)論。文中描述了人們對(duì)馬克吐溫幾部作品的評(píng)價(jià)，認(rèn)為他的作品有爭(zhēng)議性，沒(méi)有直接表現(xiàn)反對(duì)奴隸制度和種族主義，但作者認(rèn)為和他同時(shí)期的作家相比馬克吐溫在反對(duì)種族主義方面做了更大的貢獻(xiàn)。
1.推理題：從第二段可知H. B. Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin是比較有名的反奴隸制的小說(shuō)，它和其它早期的小說(shuō)一樣直接針對(duì)奴隸制，但是馬克吐溫是個(gè)例外，他把對(duì)奴隸制和偏見(jiàn)的攻擊放在那些看起來(lái)是寫(xiě)其它內(nèi)容的小說(shuō)里面，讓讀者在讀故事的時(shí)候自己去分析辨別，所以說(shuō)他不是直接地公開(kāi)反對(duì)種族主義。選B。
2.推理題：從第六段The point was difficult to miss: nurture, not nature, was the key to social status.可知是養(yǎng)育（生活環(huán)境）而不是自然是形成社會(huì)地位的關(guān)鍵。選C。
3.猜詞題：第七段的最后兩句表明我們沒(méi)有理由認(rèn)為馬克吐溫把年輕時(shí)的“黑人表演”代表了現(xiàn)實(shí)，他對(duì)奴隸制度和偏見(jiàn)的攻擊表明他明確知道這些“表演”并沒(méi)有表現(xiàn)現(xiàn)實(shí)。They指的是show，選D。、
4.主旨題“很多批評(píng)家認(rèn)為馬克吐溫的作品有爭(zhēng)議性，沒(méi)有直接表現(xiàn)出反對(duì)奴隸制度和種族主義，但作者通過(guò)對(duì)幾部小說(shuō)人物的分析指出和他同時(shí)期的作家相比馬克吐溫在反對(duì)種族主義方面做了更大的貢獻(xiàn)，選A。
考點(diǎn)：考查文化類短文