Question

書(shū)面表達(dá)。

     請(qǐng)閱讀下面一則關(guān)于“北京大學(xué)中學(xué)校長(zhǎng)實(shí)名推薦制”的新聞，根據(jù)新聞內(nèi)容、寫(xiě)作要點(diǎn)和要求，
寫(xiě)一篇短文。
     寫(xiě)作要點(diǎn)：1. 該政策的優(yōu)點(diǎn)（至少兩條）； 
                      2. 該政策的缺點(diǎn)（至少兩條）；
                      3. 你的觀點(diǎn)。
     寫(xiě)作要求：1. 短文字?jǐn)?shù)不少于100(不含已寫(xiě)好的部分)。 
                      2. 內(nèi)容充實(shí)，結(jié)構(gòu)完整，語(yǔ)意連貫。
                      3. 書(shū)寫(xiě)清晰、工整。
     Peking University Admits High School Students Recommended Without Exams BEUING, Nov. 16 (Xinhua)-
China's one of the top higher education institutions Peking University on Monday declared a name list of 39 high
school principals nationwide who are recognized to recommend their students to be admitted without taking
national college entrance examination.
     The recommended students could be given offers to the university after interviews rather than written
exams, which is part of the university's practices for its own admission rules.

     ______________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________

Answer 1

One possible version
     Peking University's policy to enron high school students recommended without exams has stirred a
heated discussion all over China. 
     Many supporters love this new policy. On the one hand, the new policy can make up for shortage of
college entrance examination system for selecting talented students and high-quality students. What's more,
the new policy can gradually change the current college enrollment method by a once-a-year national exam.
     However, the new admission policy aroused disagreernents. One reason is that it is unfair to the rest of
students and brings great pressure to student who are not outstanding but diligent because fair competition
with examination is the only chance for those students to prove themselves. What's worse, the new policy
is not easy to operate well! The criteria for these students have not been decided yet. What kind of students
have the quality to be recommended doesn't have an agreed standard. Compared with huge attraction of
admission without exams, it is likely that some students will take a risk to cheat the public. 
     As far as I am concerned, this new policy is a very good experiment to the reform of the Chinese National
Exam and enrollment svstem. However, as an experiment, it still needs some improvements.