---Hi, Peter. I’m afraid I can’t have dinner with you tomorrow night.
---________. Don’t you remember all of us agreed on it yesterday?


  1. A.
    How come?
  2. B.
    So what?
  3. C.
    It depends!
  4. D.
    No wonder!
A
試題分析:考查交際用語:A. How come?怎么回事?B. So what?那又怎樣?C. It depends! 那就看情況而定了,D. No wonder!難怪!句意:--嗨,皮特,恐怕今晚我不能和你共進(jìn)晚餐了。--怎么回事?難道你不記得昨天我們一致同意了嗎?選A。
考點(diǎn):考查交際用語
練習(xí)冊系列答案
相關(guān)習(xí)題

科目:高中英語 來源:海淀區(qū)高三年級第二學(xué)期期中練習(xí)·英語 題型:050

閱讀理解

  An 18th century statesman Edmund Burke once said, “All that is needed for the success of a misguided cause is that good people do nothing. ” One such cause now seeks to end biomedical research because of the theory that animals have rights to decide whether to be used in research. Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal rights advocates (鼓吹者), whose arguments are puzzling the public and threatening advances in health knowledge and care. Leaders of the animal rights movement attack biomedical research because it depends on public funding, and few people understand the process of health care research. Hearing false reports of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are puzzled that anyone would harm an animal on purpose.

  For example, a grandmotherly woman setting up an animal rights booth at a recent street fair was giving out sheets that encouraged readers not to use anything that comes from or is tested in animals—no meat, no fur, no medicines. Asked what will happen when epidemics (傳染病) return, she said, “Don't worry, scientists will find some way of using computers.” Such well-meaning people just don't understand.

  Scientists must communicate their message to the public in an understandable way—in human terms, not in the language of biology. We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmother's organ replacement, a father's bypass operation, a baby's vaccinations (接種疫苗), and even a pet's shots. To those who know nothing about the animal research that was needed to produce these treatments, as well as new treatments and vaccines, animal research seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.

  Much can be done. Scientists could give middle school lessons and present their own research. They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, in case animal rights misinformation goes unchallenged and gains a false appearance of truth. Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. Finally, because there are a lot of patients, the health research community should actively admit to its cause not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal research, but all who receive medical treatment. If good people do nothing, there is a real possibility that uninformed citizens will wipe out the precious of medical progress.

1.The purpose of the author beginning his article with Edmund Burke's words is to ________.

[  ]

A.call on scientists to take some actions

B.a(chǎn)rgue against the cause of animal rights

C.warn of the failure of biomedical research

D.show the success of the animal rights movement

2.In the eyes of the author, misguided people are likely to think that using an animal in research is ________.

[  ]

A.cruel but necessary

B.justice but unnecessary

C.meaningful and wasteful

D.inhuman and unacceptable

3.What can be inferred from the passage?

[  ]

A.People care very little about returns of epidemics.

B.The public lacks knowledge of biomedical science.

C.Stephen Cooper is very seriously concerned about animal treatment.

D.Scientists should make efforts to develop new cures by means of hi-tech.

4.The underlined word “threatening” in paragraph 1 means ________.

[  ]

A.doing a favour to

B.drawing attention to

C.causing a danger to

D.making their way to

查看答案和解析>>

科目:高中英語 來源:2006年北京市豐臺區(qū)一模練習(xí)英語試卷 題型:050

閱讀理解

  閱讀下列短文,從每題所給的A、B、C、D四個選項(xiàng)中,選出最佳選項(xiàng)。

  To paraphrase (釋義)18th-century statesman Edmund Burke, “all that is needed for the triumph (achievement)of a misguided cause is that good people do nothing. ”O(jiān)ne such cause now seeks to end biomedical (生物醫(yī)學(xué))research because of the theory that animals have rights ruling out their use in research. Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal rights supporters, whose arguments are confusing the public and thereby threatening advances in health knowledge and care. Leaders of the animal rights movement aim at biomedical research because it depends on public funding money, and few people understand the process of health care research. Hearing allegations (陳述辯解)of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are perplexed (puzzled)that anyone would deliberately harm an animal.

  For example, a grandmotherly woman staffing an animal rights booth at a recent street fair was delivering a brochure (小冊子)that encouraged readers not to use anything that comes from or is tested in animals - no meat, no fur, no medicines. Asked what will happen when epidemics (流行病)return, she said, “Don’t worry, scientists will find some way of using computers.” Such well-meaning people just don’t understand.

  Scientists must communicate their message to the public in a compassionate (同情的),understandable way- in human terms, not in the language of molecular biology (分子生物學(xué)). We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmother’s ignorant(無知的)remarks, a father’s bypass operation, a baby’s vaccinations (接種疫苗)and even a pet’s shots. To those who didn’t realize that animal research was needed to produce these treatments, as well as new treatments and vaccines (疫苗), animal research seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.

  Much can be done. Scientists could “adopt” middle school classes and present their own research. They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, lest (以免)animal rights misinformation go unchallenged and acquire a deceptive (導(dǎo)致誤解)appearance of truth. Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. Finally, because most of the people who are against animal experiments are patients, the health research community should actively make themselves understood by not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal research, but all who receive medical treatment. If good people do nothing, there is real possibility that the uninformed citizens will extinguish (使……不復(fù)存在)the precious of medical progress.

(1)

The author begins his article with Edmund Burke’s words to ________.

[  ]

A.

call on scientists to take some actions

B.

criticize the misguided cause of animal rights

C.

warn of the failure of biomedical research

D.

show the triumph of the animal rights movement

(2)

Misled people would like to think that using an animal in research is ________.

[  ]

A.

cruel but natural

B.

unavoidable but violent

C.

useless and wasteful

D.

inhuman and unacceptable

(3)

The example of the grandmotherly woman is used to show the public’s ________.

[  ]

A.

discontent with animal research

B.

ignorance about medical science

C.

indifference to epidemics

D.

anxiety about animal rights

(4)

The author believes that, in face of the challenge from animal rights supporters, scientists should ________.

[  ]

A.

communicate more with the public

B.

employ hi-tech means in research

C.

feel no shame for their cause

D.

continue to develop new cures

(5)

From the article we learn that Stephen Cooper is ________.

[  ]

A.

a well-known humanist

B.

a pioneer in biomedical

C.

an expert in medical science

D.

a supporter of animal research

查看答案和解析>>

科目:高中英語 來源:湖南省長沙市一中2010屆高三第三次模擬考試英語試題 題型:閱讀理解


An 18th-century statesman Edmund Burke once said, “All that is needed for the success of a misguided cause is that good people do nothing.” One such cause now seeks to end biomedical research because of the theory that animals have rights to decide whether to be used in research. Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal rights advocates, whose arguments are puzzling the public and threatening advances in health knowledge and care. Leaders of the animal rights movement attack biomedical research because it depends on public funding, and few people understand the process of health care research. Hearing false reports of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are puzzled that anyone would harm an animal on purpose.
For example, a grandmotherly woman setting up an animal rights booth at a recent street fair was giving out sheets that encouraged readers not to use anything that comes from or is tested in animals-no meat, no fur, no medicines. Asked what will happen when epidemics(傳染病) return, she said. “Don’t worry, scientists will find some way of using computers.” Such well-meaning people just don’t understand.
Scientists must communicate their message to the public in an understandable way-in human terms, not in the language of biology. We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmother’s organ replacement, a father’s bypass operation, a baby’s vaccinations(接種疫苗), and even a pet’s shots. To those who know nothing about the animal research that was needed to produce these treatments, as well as new treatments and vaccines, animal research seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.
Much can be done. Scientists could give middle school lessons and present their own research. They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, in case animal rights misinformation goes unchallenged and gains a false appearance of truth. Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. Finally, because there are a lot of patients, the health research community should actively recruit(招募) not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal research, but all who receive medical treatment. If good people do nothing, there is a real possibility that uninformed citizens will wipe out the precious of medical progress.
1. The purpose of the author beginning his article with Edmund Burke’s words is to _____.
A.call on scientists to take some actions
B.a(chǎn)rgue against the cause of animal rights
C.warn of the failure of biomedical research
D.show the success of the animal rights movement
2. In the second paragraph, the author took a grandmotherly woman as an example to show ____.
A. the way to prevent epidemics           B. the innocence of the woman
C. how strong the opposition was     D. how important the animal rights were
3. In the eyes of the author, misguided people are likely to think that using an animal in research
is ______.
A.cruel but necessary           B.just but unnecessary
C.meaningful and wasteful    D.inhuman and unacceptable
4. What can be inferred from the passage?
A.People care very little about returns of epidemics.
B.The public lacks knowledge of biomedical science.
C.Stephen Cooper is very seriously concerned about animal treatment.
D.Scientists should make efforts to develop new cures by means of hi-tech.
5. According to the passage, the author’s attitude toward biomedical research is ________.
A. Disinterested                B. Indifferent                C. Objective                 D. Supportive

查看答案和解析>>

科目:高中英語 來源:湖南省長沙市2010屆高三第三次模擬考試英語試題 題型:閱讀理解

An 18th-century statesman Edmund Burke once said, “All that is needed for the success of a misguided cause is that good people do nothing.” One such cause now seeks to end biomedical research because of the theory that animals have rights to decide whether to be used in research. Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal rights advocates, whose arguments are puzzling the public and threatening advances in health knowledge and care. Leaders of the animal rights movement attack biomedical research because it depends on public funding, and few people understand the process of health care research. Hearing false reports of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are puzzled that anyone would harm an animal on purpose.

For example, a grandmotherly woman setting up an animal rights booth at a recent street fair was giving out sheets that encouraged readers not to use anything that comes from or is tested in animals-no meat, no fur, no medicines. Asked what will happen when epidemics(傳染病) return, she said. “Don’t worry, scientists will find some way of using computers.” Such well-meaning people just don’t understand.

Scientists must communicate their message to the public in an understandable way-in human terms, not in the language of biology. We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmother’s organ replacement, a father’s bypass operation, a baby’s vaccinations(接種疫苗), and even a pet’s shots. To those who know nothing about the animal research that was needed to produce these treatments, as well as new treatments and vaccines, animal research seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.

Much can be done. Scientists could give middle school lessons and present their own research. They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, in case animal rights misinformation goes unchallenged and gains a false appearance of truth. Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. Finally, because there are a lot of patients, the health research community should actively recruit(招募) not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal research, but all who receive medical treatment. If good people do nothing, there is a real possibility that uninformed citizens will wipe out the precious of medical progress.

1. The purpose of the author beginning his article with Edmund Burke’s words is to _____.

A.call on scientists to take some actions

B.a(chǎn)rgue against the cause of animal rights

C.warn of the failure of biomedical research

D.show the success of the animal rights movement

2. In the second paragraph, the author took a grandmotherly woman as an example to show ____.

A. the way to prevent epidemics           B. the innocence of the woman

C. how strong the opposition was     D. how important the animal rights were

3. In the eyes of the author, misguided people are likely to think that using an animal in research

is ______.

A.cruel but necessary           B.just but unnecessary

C.meaningful and wasteful    D.inhuman and unacceptable

4. What can be inferred from the passage?

A.People care very little about returns of epidemics.

B.The public lacks knowledge of biomedical science.

C.Stephen Cooper is very seriously concerned about animal treatment.

D.Scientists should make efforts to develop new cures by means of hi-tech.

5. According to the passage, the author’s attitude toward biomedical research is ________.

A. Disinterested                B. Indifferent                C. Objective                 D. Supportive

 

查看答案和解析>>

科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:閱讀理解

An 18th-century statesman Edmund Burke once said, “All that is needed for the success of a misguided cause is that good people do nothing.” One such cause now seeks to end biomedical research because of the theory that animals have rights to decide whether to be used in research. Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal rights advocates, whose arguments are puzzling the public and threatening advances in health knowledge and care. Leaders of the animal rights movement attack biomedical research because it depends on public funding, and few people understand the process of health care research. Hearing false reports of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are puzzled that anyone would harm an animal on purpose.

For example, a grandmotherly woman setting up an animal rights booth at a recent street fair was giving out sheets that encouraged readers not to use anything that comes from or is tested in animals-no meat, no fur, no medicines. Asked what will happen when epidemics(傳染病) return, she said. “Don’t worry, scientists will find some way of using computers.” Such well-meaning people just don’t understand.

Scientists must communicate their message to the public in an understandable way-in human terms, not in the language of biology. We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmother’s organ replacement, a father’s bypass operation, a baby’s vaccinations(接種疫苗), and even a pet’s shots. To those who know nothing about the animal research that was needed to produce these treatments, as well as new treatments and vaccines, animal research seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.

Much can be done. Scientists could give middle school lessons and present their own research. They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, in case animal rights misinformation goes unchallenged and gains a false appearance of truth. Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. Finally, because there are a lot of patients, the health research community should actively recruit(招募) not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal research, but all who receive medical treatment. If good people do nothing, there is a real possibility that uninformed citizens will wipe out the precious of medical progress.

1. The purpose of the author beginning his article with Edmund Burke’s words is to _____.

       A.call on scientists to take some actions

       B.a(chǎn)rgue against the cause of animal rights

       C.warn of the failure of biomedical research

       D.show the success of the animal rights movement

2. In the second paragraph, the author took a grandmotherly woman as an example to show ____.

  A. the way to prevent epidemics            B. the innocence of the woman

  C. how strong the opposition was     D. how important the animal rights were

3. In the eyes of the author, misguided people are likely to think that using an animal in research

is ______.

       A.cruel but necessary            B.just but unnecessary

       C.meaningful and wasteful     D.inhuman and unacceptable

4. What can be inferred from the passage?

       A.People care very little about returns of epidemics.

       B.The public lacks knowledge of biomedical science.

       C.Stephen Cooper is very seriously concerned about animal treatment.

       D.Scientists should make efforts to develop new cures by means of hi-tech.

5. According to the passage, the author’s attitude toward biomedical research is ________.

  A. Disinterested                B. Indifferent                C. Objective                 D. Supportive

查看答案和解析>>

同步練習(xí)冊答案