Question

 

第六部分   書面表達(dá)（滿分20分）

北京大學(xué)2010年將試行由中學(xué)校長(zhǎng)實(shí)名推薦的招生改革。被推薦的學(xué)生高考成績(jī)可獲得30分的加分。2009年11月16日北大公布了39所有推薦資格的中學(xué)名單。北大這一舉措在全國(guó)引起了一場(chǎng)激烈的爭(zhēng)論。請(qǐng)根據(jù)以下要點(diǎn)給《中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)》寫一篇有關(guān)這場(chǎng)爭(zhēng)論的報(bào)導(dǎo)，并表達(dá)你對(duì)這場(chǎng)爭(zhēng)論的看法（至少兩點(diǎn)）。

支持方意見	反對(duì)方意見
是改革當(dāng)前高考制度的大膽嘗試。 能確保高素質(zhì)學(xué)生和有特殊才華學(xué)生進(jìn)入一流大學(xué)。 促進(jìn)中學(xué)重視學(xué)生的全面發(fā)展。	可能導(dǎo)致作假。 對(duì)全國(guó)那么多中學(xué)不公平。   給被推薦的學(xué)生加分沒意義。
你的看法：1. ……                        2. ……

注意：     1．對(duì)所給要點(diǎn)逐一陳述，適當(dāng)發(fā)揮，不要簡(jiǎn)單翻譯。

2．詞數(shù)100字左右。開頭已經(jīng)寫好，不計(jì)入總詞數(shù)。

3．參考詞匯：（1）大膽的  bold  （2）透明的 transparent 

Peking University will enroll students recommended by high school principals next year. The recommended students will have an extra 30 points added to their national college entrance exam scores. Peking University’s move has set off a nationwide debate.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Answer 1

【答案】

 

One possible version:

Peking University will enroll students recommended by high school principals this year. The recommended students will have an extra 30 points added to their national college entrance exam scores. Peking University’s move has set off a nationwide debate.

Some people approve of this move. They think this is the bold attempt Peking University has made at reforming the current university entrance system. This move provides quality students and students talented in certain subjects with an opportunity to enter first-class universities and ensure that they aren’t overlooked simply because of their performance in the national university entrance exam. Meanwhile, it will push high schools to pay more attention to the students’ all-round development.

However, quite a few people object to the move. Firstly, it may lead to cheating. Secondly, only 39 schools are qualified to recommend students, which is unfair to so many schools across the country. Thirdly, there is no point giving extra scores to those recommended students, for they are mostly top students and have no problem entering Peking University.

As far as I’m concerned, I’m in favor of this reform. As the process of recommendation is transparent, cheating is impossible. Besides, we should support new reforms even if they are not mature.                                                                                                           Yours

Li Ming

 

【解析】