Question

5．One day，when I was working as a psychologist in England，an adolescent boy showed up in my office．It was David．He kept walking up and down restlessly，his face pale，and his hands shaking slightly．His head teacher had referred him to me．"This boy has lost his family，"he wrote．"He is understandably very sad and refuses to talk to others，and I'm very worried about him．Can you help？"
I looked at David and showed him to a chair．How could I help him？There are problems psychology doesn't have the answer to，and which no words can describe．Sometimes the best thing one can do is to listen openly and sympathetically．
The first two times we met，David didn't say a word．He sat there，only looking up to look at the children's drawings on the wall behind me．I suggested we play a game of chess．He nodded．After that he played chess with me every Wednesday afternoon-in complete silence and without looking at me．It's not easy to cheat in chess，but I admit I made sure David won once or twice．
Usually，he arrived earlier than agreed，took the chess board and pieces from the shelf and began setting them up before I even got a chance to sit down．It seemed as if he enjoyed my company．But why did he never look at me？
"Perhaps he simply needs someone to share his pain with，"I thought．"Perhaps he senses that I respect his suffering．"Some months later，when we were playing chess，he looked up at me suddenly．
"It's your turn，"he said．
After that day，David started talking．He got friends in school and joined a bicycle club．He wrote to me a few times，about his biking with some friends，and about his plan to get into university．Now he had really started to live his own life．
Maybe I gave David something．But I also learned that one-without any words-can reach out to another person．All it takes is a hug，a shoulder to cry on，a friendly touch，and an ear that listens．

36．When he first met the author，DavidC
A．felt a little excited                                                     
B．walked energetically
C．looked a little nervous                                          
D．showed up with his teacher
37．As a psychologist，the authorA
A．was ready to listen to David                                         
B．was skeptical about psychology
C．was able to describe David's problem                     
D．was sure of handling David's problem
38．David enjoyed being with the author because heB
A．wanted to ask the author for advice                        
B．need to share sorrow with the author
C．liked the children's drawings in the office               
D．bear the author many times in the chess game
39．What can be inferred about David？A
A．He recovered after months of treatment．
B．He liked biking before he lost his family．
C．He went into university soon after starting to talk．
D．He got friends in school before he met the author．
40．What made David change？D
A．His teacher's help．
B．The author's friendship．
C．His exchange of letters with the author．
D．The author's silent communication with him．

Answer 1

分析 本文為記敘文．戴維因?yàn)槭�去了家人而非常傷心，拒絕與別人交流，"我"作為一名心理醫(yī)生成功地使他恢復(fù)了正常．"我"采取的方法就是跟他下棋，讓他感受到"我"理解他的痛苦．人與人的交流不只是通過(guò)語(yǔ)言，也可能是一個(gè)擁抱、一個(gè)哭泣時(shí)可以依靠的肩膀、一次友好的接觸或者一只耐心傾聽(tīng)的耳朵．

解答 36．C 細(xì)節(jié)理解題．根據(jù)第一段中的He kept walking up and down restlessly，his face pale，and his hands shaking slightly．可知，第一次見(jiàn)面時(shí)，他表現(xiàn)得非常緊張．戴維失去了親人，故不是"感到興奮"或者"精力充沛地散步"，排除A項(xiàng)和B項(xiàng)．根據(jù)His head teacher had referred him to me．以及he wrote可知，他的老師把他介紹給作者，但沒(méi)有陪著他來(lái)，故D項(xiàng)錯(cuò)誤．
37．A 推理判斷題．根據(jù)第二段最后一句Sometimes the best thing one can do is to listen openly and sympathetically．可知，作者準(zhǔn)備去做一名傾聽(tīng)者．文章雖提到有些問(wèn)題心理學(xué)也無(wú)法給出答案，但這并不能說(shuō)明作者對(duì)心理學(xué)持懷疑的態(tài)度，故B項(xiàng)錯(cuò)誤；根據(jù)第二段中的and which no words can describe可排除C項(xiàng)；通過(guò)第二段中的How could I help him？以及"有些問(wèn)題心理學(xué)也無(wú)法給出答案"可知，作者并不確信自己能解決戴維的問(wèn)題，故排除D項(xiàng)．
38．B  推理判斷題．根據(jù)第五段中的perhaps he simply needs someone to share his pain with 可以得出答案．屬于原詞重現(xiàn)．
39．A 細(xì)節(jié)理解題根據(jù)后文的表達(dá) David 開(kāi)始和作者交談，交上朋友，加入自行車(chē)俱樂(lè)部，這些都說(shuō)明他已經(jīng)痊愈了．其中BCD的先后順序與文章得表達(dá)不符．
40．D 推理判斷題．結(jié)合故事內(nèi)容以及最后一段可知，是作者和他無(wú)聲的交流幫助戴維恢復(fù)了正常．他的老師只起到了介紹的作用，故排除A項(xiàng)；作者之前和戴維并不存在友誼，故排除B項(xiàng)；在戴維恢復(fù)正常之后，雙方才開(kāi)始通信，故排除C項(xiàng)．

點(diǎn)評(píng) 分析文章，歸納主題，屬于分析、概括、綜合的表述能力的考查．切忌脫離文章，架空分析，一定讓分析在文章中有依據(jù)．