Question

【題目】Over 500 dogs being delivered to a butcher house were saved by a Chinese animal protection organization. The incident then triggered debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.

On Friday, a truck loaded with over 500 dogs were stopped by volunteers from animal protection organization on Jingha expressway Beijing section. Beijing Times reported these dogs were being delivered to slaughter houses in the city of Changchun, northeast Jilin province and would be eventually served on dinner tables.

After negotiations with the truck driver, pet service provider Leepet Holding Corp. and a philanthropic foundation, Shangshan Foundation, purchased these dogs, each paying 50,000 yuan. Dogs were then delivered to the headquarter of China Small Animal Protection Association (CS APA), being taken care of and waiting for adoption.

After the “dog saving mission” was reported, Chinese net users debate over whether saving dogs worth so much efforts and money while there are still many poor and needy people in China lacking assistance.

Some net users argue the dog saving mission is placing over attention to animals while lots of needy people are still left unattended.

A microblogger “Xiaowulaitajie” said on China’s twitter-like website, weibo.com, “Dogs are saved, adopted and they attracted media spotlight. We'd better spend such money and take such efforts in helping the needy people.”

Another microblogger, Liluping, said "We poured such huge sum of money into saving dogs. I would rather the money be spent on disaster relief."

Some applaud volunteers’ actions and show eagerness of offering their helping hands to those saved dogs.

Still many disapprove those "saving dogs" critics, but they argue that such act nonetheless embodies social progress.

A microblogger named "broken bridge" said, saving dogs does not run counter to taking care of people. Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.

I think people and animals are created equal .Attention should be paid to people as well as animals.

【1】Where did the article come from ___________?

A. newspaper B. Internet

C. a TV programme D. a magazine

【2】 Whose opinion is closest to the writer's?

A. Some net users' B. Xiaowulaitajie's

C. Liluping's D. Broken bridge's

【3】Which statement is TRUE according to the passage?

A. All the people think it right to save these dogs with so much money.

B. These dogs were finally saved and sent back to their owners.

C. Some volunteers support the actions to save these dogs and the people who offered their helping hands to those saved dogs.

D. 100,000 yuan was given to the truck driver to purchase these dogs.

Answer 1

【答案】

【4】B

【1】D

【2】D

【解析】

試題分析:本文是一篇議論文。講述的是即將被屠殺的500多只狗狗被中國一家動物保護(hù)組織所救，共花費10萬買下這批狗狗。這件事件引發(fā)了中國網(wǎng)友的熱議，不同網(wǎng)友發(fā)表不同的意見。作者認(rèn)為狗和人一樣都是平等的，需要給予同等關(guān)心。

【4】B細(xì)節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)第一段The incident then triggered debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.可知篇文章來自于網(wǎng)絡(luò)，因為這個事件引起了中國網(wǎng)民的熱議。故選B。

【1】D推理判斷題。根據(jù)倒數(shù)第二段A microblogger named "broken bridge" said, saving dogs does not run counter to taking care of people. Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.可知一位名叫斷橋的博主說拯救狗狗和關(guān)心人類是不想違背的，公眾的情感將會提高社會意識去幫助需要幫助的人。作者認(rèn)為狗和人一樣都是平等的，需要給予同等關(guān)心。故選D。

【2】D推理判斷題。根據(jù)第三段After negotiations with the truck driver, pet service provider Leepet Holding Corp. and a philanthropic foundation, Shangshan Foundation, purchased these dogs, each paying 50,000 yuan. 可知兩個公司分別支付了5萬元，兩個公司加起來共花費了10萬元。故選D。