考查情態(tài)動詞的用法。句意為：你什么意思，只有10張票嗎？應該是12張。should表示可能性推測，意為“應該”，符合句意。would表示過去將來；will表示意愿；shall表示一種語氣，均不合句意。

 

 I prefer a flat in Inverness to       in Perth , because I want to live near my Mom’s .

A. one     B. that         C. it       D. this

【詳解】考查代詞的用法。one表示泛指，相當于“a(an)+名詞”，代替的是同類事物中的“一個”；that表示特指，相當于“the+名詞”；it所代替的是前面提到過的同一事物；this表示近指。故選答案A。

 

寫作(滿分25分)

假設你叫王平，李華是你的同窗好友，請根據(jù)下列要點，用英文給李華寫一篇畢業(yè)留言。

要點：1.簡要表述李華在你心目中的印象；

2.用一到兩個相關事例進行具體描述；

3.對李華表示美好的祝愿。

注意：1.內(nèi)容積極向上，語意連貫，結構完整。詞數(shù)120左右。

2.不能寫成詩歌形式；不能使用真實姓名和學校名稱。

Cutting global warming pollution would not only make the planet healthier, it would make people healthier too, new research suggests.

Cutting carbon dioxide emissions could save millions of lives, mostly by reducing preventable deaths from heart and lung diseases, according to studies released Wednesday and published in a special issue of The Lancet British medical journal.

“Relying on fossil fuels leads to unhealthy lifestyles, increasing our chances for getting sick and in some cases takes years from our lives,” US Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a telecast (電視廣播) briefing from her home state of Kansas. “As greenhouse gas emissions go down, so do deaths from cardiovascular (心血管的) and respiratory diseases (呼吸疾病). This is not a small effect.”

Instead of looking at the health ills caused by future global warming, as past studies have done, this research looks at the immediate benefits of doing something about the problem, said Linda Birnbaum, director of the US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

Some possible benefits seemed highly speculative (投機的，推測的), the researchers conceded (承認，給予), based on people driving less and walking and cycling more. Other proposals studied were more concrete and achievable, such as reducing cook stoves that burn dung (糞便), charcoal and other polluting fuels in the developing world.

And cutting carbon dioxide emissions also makes the air cleaner, reducing lung damage for millions of people, doctors said.

“Here are ways you can attack major health problems at the same time as dealing with climate change," said lead author Dr. Paul Wilkinson, an environmental epidemiologist at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Wilkinson said the individual studies came up with numbers of premature deaths prevented or extra years of life added for certain places.

For example, switching to low-polluting cars in London and Delhi, India, would save 160 lost years of life in London and nearly 1,700 in Delhi for every million residents, one study found. But if people also drove less and walked or biked more, those extra saved years would soar (高聳，高漲) to more than 7,300 years in London and 12,500 years in Delhi because of less heart disease.

1.What does the passage mainly about?

A. How can people live longer.

B. Cutting carbon dioxide emissions saves life.

C. Global warming threatens people’s lives

D. People should stop relying on fossil fuels

2.The new research differs from past studies in that ________.

A. it focuses on the immediate benefits of cutting carbon dioxide emissions

B. it studies the bad effects arising from future global warming

C. it is believed by most people

D. it mainly targets at developing countries

3.According to Kathleen Sebelius ________.

A. sometimes it takes years to see the bad effects caused by consuming fossil fuels

B. without greenhouse gas emissions, people would not die of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases

C. the main reason why people get sick is that they rely on fossil fuels

D. death from cardiovascular and respiratory diseases are closely related to greenhouse gas emissions

4.It can be inferred from the passage that ________.

A. London and Delhi have already benefited from reducing greenhouse gas emissions

B. switching to low-polluting cars would save 160 lives in London every year

C. walking and biking instead of driving will reduce the chance of heart disease

D. attacking health problems and dealing with climate change are contradictory