He ________ of how he can do more for the people.

[　　]

A．will always think

B．is always thinking

C．has always been thought

D．does think always

The people below are trying to choose which TV program to watch.Read the descriptions and help each person make the right decision.?

__________1.Mary is a housewife.She likes cooking very much.She takes care of her two sons while his husband goes to work during the day.It brings her great happiness when she offers her sons delicious food.?

__________2.Although Rob leads a quiet life in a small village,that doesn’t stop him from wanting to find out about the latest scientific development.?

__________3.Bella enjoys eating out but can’t afford to spend very much at the moment as she is saving for a holiday.She has never learnt how to cook,so now might be quite a good time to find out!?

__________4.Dan is interested in taking wildlife photographs and enjoys the kind of program which gives him a chance to see a professional photographer at work.?

__________5.Ron’s wife is in hospital.He wants to find a program suitable for his three-year-old son while he gets on with the housework and prepares a meal.

A.TV1　7:20 p.m.Find out more about Australia’s animal life.This film was made last year by one of Australia’s best-known cameramen,Gougie Bond.He spent over 200 hours filming the birds,animals and dish that inhabit this beautiful continent and for the first time brings some of these unusual animals to our TV screens.?

B.TV3　9:00 p.m.The popular science program is back with the latest in technology and medicine.This week,cars that run on sunlight and the story of one baby’s fight to live.?

C.TV2　8:10 p.m.Do you to think what goes into the food most of us eat every day of the week?Tonight’s program takes a serious scientific look at the bread industry.Whether you bake your own bread or just enjoy buying it,this program will give you an interesting insight into something most of us eat every day of the week.?

D.TV1　5:15 p.m.Busy parents?Bored children?Do you want something educational to entertain your children while you do something else?This popular magazine program is for the under-fives.More music,fun,songs and games with Carla and Larry.?

E.TV3　8:45 p.m.If you’ve always wanted to cook,it’s your chance to learn.In the studio are two chefs who will take you through some simple recipes step by step.This is a repeat of the popular series shown last year,and available from most good bookshops.?F.TV9　6:00 p.m If you like travel,and if you are interested in China.Do not miss this programme.It is about the culture and travel in China.You will be deeply impressed by the beautiful scenery and the different customs from your own.?

One of my China Dialogue colleagues in Beijing recently bought a Philips energy-saving light bulb to replace a standard one．He was happy with his choice．It may have cost 30 yuan （just under US$4．50） - ten times the price of a filament （燈絲） bulb - but he wanted to save energy as part of his low-carbon lifestyle．And according to the shopkeeper, he would save, in the long run, much more than the 30 yuan he was spending．

Yet only one month later, his expensive light bulb blew up, before he had saved even a small part of the purchase price．Will he stick to his high-cost, low-carbon lifestyle?

China's environmental organizations have started to advocate low-carbon lifestyles and the decrease of carbon footprints to help fight against climate change．But they have overlooked one fact: in China, low-carbon living comes at a high cost．It means buying energy-saving bulbs and appliances, and environmentally friendly building materials and daily goods．Cost can no longer be the only standard for purchases．An energy-saving and environmentally friendly product is more expensive than a standard alternative - whether it's a simple light bulb or the house it shines．For average consumers, even buying an ordinary bulb is a huge burden．How can we persuade ordinary people to choose an energy-saving residence? This is not a trend they can afford to follow; perhaps this fashion is only for the rich．

Most consumers today do not cause huge carbon dioxide （CO₂） emissions．Their responsibility lies not in choosing a low-carbon lifestyle today, but in avoiding a high-carbon life in the future．The principle of "common but differentiated responsibility" - a basis of sustainable development - can be applied here as well．

In China, low-carbon living still is resisted by a lack of social infrastructure（基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施）. Even if your salary allows you to make that choice, nobody is there to help you accomplish it．

Consider energy-saving homes. You need to find out whether or not the developer has used natural materials wherever possible; how effective the insulation（絕緣物、隔熱物） is; and what the green credentials of installed equipment are．You can read up a little, but you'll still be lucky to avoid being puzzled by the developers' marketing．Many so-called energy-saving buildings are nothing of the sort, and some are even more energy-hungry than the average home - as Li Taige warned in his article "Energy-efficient buildings? Not always", on China Dialogue last August．

1. What may probably be the best title of this passage?

A. To purchase a cheap bulb - your wise alternative．

B. To choose an energy-saving residence - a must of your life

C. To learn a low-carbon lifestyle - each citizen's responsibility

D. To learn a low-carbon lifestyle - a promising but difficult purpose

2.Why does the writer say this fashion is only for the rich in the fourth paragraph?

A. Because the cost is a very important standard for purchases.        

B. Because buying an ordinary bulb is very expensive.

C. Because energy-saving products are more expensive than the common alternatives.

D. Because rich people like to follow this trend.

3. What does the writer think of energy-saving homes?

A. Most of them are environmentally friendly.

B. They are musts of low-carbon lifestyle of Chinese.

C. They are huge burdens for Chinese people.

D. Many of them are more in name than in reality.

4.We can infer from the passage that ____．

A. Using energy-saving bulbs and appliances is a fashion．

B. It's easy for most Chinese to try to learn a low-carbon lifestyle．

C. All citizens in China don’t have the same responsibility in living a low-carbon lifestyle．

D. Most Chinese families cannot afford to purchase an energy-saving residence.

5.What is the writer's attitude towards the low-carbon lifestyle?

A. informative and entertaining           B. supportive but cautious

C. negative but wise                      D. positive and active

One of my China Dialogue colleagues in Beijing recently bought a Philips energy-saving light bulb to replace a standard one．He was happy with his choice．It may have cost 30 yuan （just under US$4．50） - ten times the price of a filament （燈絲） bulb - but he wanted to save energy as part of his low-carbon lifestyle．And according to the shopkeeper, he would save, in the long run, much more than the 30 yuan he was spending．

Yet only one month later, his expensive light bulb blew up, before he had saved even a small part of the purchase price．Will he stick to his high-cost, low-carbon lifestyle?

China's environmental organizations have started to advocate low-carbon lifestyles and the decrease of carbon footprints to help fight against climate change．But they have overlooked one fact: in China, low-carbon living comes at a high cost．It means buying energy-saving bulbs and appliances, and environmentally friendly building materials and daily goods．Cost can no longer be the only standard for purchases．An energy-saving and environmentally friendly product is more expensive than a standard alternative - whether it's a simple light bulb or the house it shines．For average consumers, even buying an ordinary bulb is a huge burden．How can we persuade ordinary people to choose an energy-saving residence? This is not a trend they can afford to follow; perhaps this fashion is only for the rich．

Most consumers today do not cause huge carbon dioxide （CO₂） emissions．Their responsibility lies not in choosing a low-carbon lifestyle today, but in avoiding a high-carbon life in the future．The principle of "common but differentiated responsibility" - a basis of sustainable development - can be applied here as well．

In China, low-carbon living still is resisted by a lack of social infrastructure（基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施）. Even if your salary allows you to make that choice, nobody is there to help you accomplish it．

Consider energy-saving homes. You need to find out whether or not the developer has used natural materials wherever possible; how effective the insulation（絕緣物、隔熱物） is; and what the green credentials of installed equipment are．You can read up a little, but you'll still be lucky to avoid being puzzled by the developers' marketing．Many so-called energy-saving buildings are nothing of the sort, and some are even more energy-hungry than the average home - as Li Taige warned in his article "Energy-efficient buildings? Not always", on China Dialogue last August．

1.What may probably be the best title of this passage?

A. To purchase a cheap bulb - your wise alternative．

B. To choose an energy-saving residence - a must of your life

C. To learn a low-carbon lifestyle - each citizen's responsibility

D. To learn a low-carbon lifestyle - a promising but difficult purpose

2.Why does the writer say this fashion is only for the rich in the fourth paragraph?

A. Because the cost is a very important standard for purchases.        

B. Because buying an ordinary bulb is very expensive.

C. Because energy-saving products are more expensive than the common alternatives.

D. Because rich people like to follow this trend.

3.What does the writer think of energy-saving homes?

A. Most of them are environmentally friendly.

B. They are musts of low-carbon lifestyle of Chinese.

C. They are huge burdens for Chinese people.

D. Many of them are more in name than in reality.

4.We can infer from the passage that ____．

A. Using energy-saving bulbs and appliances is a fashion．

B. It's easy for most Chinese to try to learn a low-carbon lifestyle．

C. All citizens in China don’t have the same responsibility in living a low-carbon lifestyle．

D. Most Chinese families cannot afford to purchase an energy-saving residence.

5.What is the writer's attitude towards the low-carbon lifestyle?

A. informative and entertaining           B. supportive but cautious

C. negative but wise                      D. positive and active

One of my China Dialogue colleagues in Beijing recently bought a Philips energy-saving light bulb to replace a standard one．He was happy with his choice．It may have cost 30 yuan （just under US$4．50） - ten times the price of a filament （燈絲） bulb - but he wanted to save energy as part of his low-carbon lifestyle．And according to the shopkeeper, he would save, in the long run, much more than the 30 yuan he was spending．
Yet only one month later, his expensive light bulb blew up, before he had saved even a small part of the purchase price．Will he stick to his high-cost, low-carbon lifestyle?
China's environmental organizations have started to advocate low-carbon lifestyles and the decrease of carbon footprints to help fight against climate change．But they have overlooked one fact: in China, low-carbon living comes at a high cost．It means buying energy-saving bulbs and appliances, and environmentally friendly building materials and daily goods．Cost can no longer be the only standard for purchases．An energy-saving and environmentally friendly product is more expensive than a standard alternative - whether it's a simple light bulb or the house it shines．For average consumers, even buying an ordinary bulb is a huge burden．How can we persuade ordinary people to choose an energy-saving residence? This is not a trend they can afford to follow; perhaps this fashion is only for the rich．
Most consumers today do not cause huge carbon dioxide （CO₂） emissions．Their responsibility lies not in choosing a low-carbon lifestyle today, but in avoiding a high-carbon life in the future．The principle of "common but differentiated responsibility" - a basis of sustainable development - can be applied here as well．
In China, low-carbon living still is resisted by a lack of social infrastructure（基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施）. Even if your salary allows you to make that choice, nobody is there to help you accomplish it．
Consider energy-saving homes. You need to find out whether or not the developer has used natural materials wherever possible; how effective the insulation（絕緣物、隔熱物） is; and what the green credentials of installed equipment are．You can read up a little, but you'll still be lucky to avoid being puzzled by the developers' marketing．Many so-called energy-saving buildings are nothing of the sort, and some are even more energy-hungry than the average home - as Li Taige warned in his article "Energy-efficient buildings? Not always", on China Dialogue last August．

1. 1.

   What may probably be the best title of this passage?

   1. A.
      To purchase a cheap bulb - your wise alternative．
   2. B.
      To choose an energy-saving residence - a must of your life
   3. C.
      To learn a low-carbon lifestyle - each citizen's responsibility
   4. D.
      To learn a low-carbon lifestyle - a promising but difficult purpose
2. 2.

   Why does the writer say this fashion is only for the rich in the fourth paragraph?

   1. A.
      Because the cost is a very important standard for purchases
   2. B.
      Because buying an ordinary bulb is very expensive
   3. C.
      Because energy-saving products are more expensive than the common alternatives
   4. D.
      Because rich people like to follow this trend
3. 3.

   What does the writer think of energy-saving homes?

   1. A.
      Most of them are environmentally friendly
   2. B.
      They are musts of low-carbon lifestyle of Chinese
   3. C.
      They are huge burdens for Chinese people
   4. D.
      Many of them are more in name than in reality
4. 4.

   We can infer from the passage that ____．

   1. A.
      Using energy-saving bulbs and appliances is a fashion．
   2. B.
      It's easy for most Chinese to try to learn a low-carbon lifestyle．
   3. C.
      All citizens in China don’t have the same responsibility in living a low-carbon lifestyle．
   4. D.
      Most Chinese families cannot afford to purchase an energy-saving residence
5. 5.

   What is the writer's attitude towards the low-carbon lifestyle?

   1. A.
      informative and entertaining
   2. B.
      supportive but cautious
   3. C.
      negative but wise
   4. D.
      positive and active

One of my China Dialogue colleagues in Beijing recently bought a Philips energy-saving light bulb to replace a standard one．He was happy with his choice．It may have cost 30 yuan （just under US$4．50） - ten times the price of a filament （燈絲） bulb - but he wanted to save energy as part of his low-carbon lifestyle．And according to the shopkeeper, he would save, in the long run, much more than the 30 yuan he was spending．

Yet only one month later, his expensive light bulb blew up, before he had saved even a small part of the purchase price．Will he stick to his high-cost, low-carbon lifestyle?

China's environmental organizations have started to advocate low-carbon lifestyles and the decrease of carbon footprints to help fight against climate change．But they have overlooked one fact: in China, low-carbon living comes at a high cost．It means buying energy-saving bulbs and appliances, and environmentally friendly building materials and daily goods．Cost can no longer be the only standard for purchases．An energy-saving and environmentally friendly product is more expensive than a standard alternative - whether it's a simple light bulb or the house it shines．For average consumers, even buying an ordinary bulb is a huge burden．How can we persuade ordinary people to choose an energy-saving residence? This is not a trend they can afford to follow; perhaps this fashion is only for the rich．

Most consumers today do not cause huge carbon dioxide （CO₂） emissions．Their responsibility lies not in choosing a low-carbon lifestyle today, but in avoiding a high-carbon life in the future．The principle of "common but differentiated responsibility" - a basis of sustainable development - can be applied here as well．

In China, low-carbon living still is resisted by a lack of social infrastructure（基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施）. Even if your salary allows you to make that choice, nobody is there to help you accomplish it．

Consider energy-saving homes. You need to find out whether or not the developer has used natural materials wherever possible; how effective the insulation（絕緣物、隔熱物） is; and what the green credentials of installed equipment are．You can read up a little, but you'll still be lucky to avoid being puzzled by the developers' marketing．Many so-called energy-saving buildings are nothing of the sort, and some are even more energy-hungry than the average home - as Li Taige warned in his article "Energy-efficient buildings? Not always", on China Dialogue last August．

61. What may probably be the best title of this passage?

       A. To purchase a cheap bulb - your wise alternative．

       B. To choose an energy-saving residence - a must of your life

       C. To learn a low-carbon lifestyle - each citizen's responsibility

       D. To learn a low-carbon lifestyle - a promising but difficult purpose

62. Why does the writer say this fashion is only for the rich in the fourth paragraph?

       A. Because the cost is a very important standard for purchases.    

    B. Because buying an ordinary bulb is very expensive.

       C. Because energy-saving products are more expensive than the common alternatives.

       D. Because rich people like to follow this trend.

63. What does the writer think of energy-saving homes?

    A. Most of them are environmentally friendly.

    B. They are musts of low-carbon lifestyle of Chinese.

    C. They are huge burdens for Chinese people.

    D. Many of them are more in name than in reality.

64. We can infer from the passage that ____．

       A. Using energy-saving bulbs and appliances is a fashion．

       B. It's easy for most Chinese to try to learn a low-carbon lifestyle．

       C. All citizens in China don’t have the same responsibility in living a low-carbon lifestyle．

       D. Most Chinese families cannot afford to purchase an energy-saving residence.

65. What is the writer's attitude towards the low-carbon lifestyle?

       A. informative and entertaining         B. supportive but cautious

       C. negative but wise                   D. positive and active

I was always complaining about wind or rain.  26  it was nothing unusual for the arrival of wind or rain, it caused inconvenience for me to go out, and sometimes it even created an awful atmosphere, so I  27  it strongly.

On a rainy day a meteorologist（氣象學(xué)家）I met was very  28  at my great anger caused by rain that made a little inconvenience for me.

He asked, “Have you ever seen typhoon? Do you know what would happen to the world if there were no typhoon?” I shook my head. I had no  29  of how overwhelming it was when it  30  everything away in its way.

“Well, let me tell you,” the meteorologist said. “Without it the  31  of fresh water will be more serious, for it is a great  32  of water supply on earth, Without it, there would be a greater imbalance in the distribution of  33 . The equatorial area that receives the most sunshine on earth  34  entirely on typhoon to disperse（驅(qū)散）heat. Without typhoon the tropics would be even  35  while the frigid zones much colder. As a result the temperate zones would  36  from the world...”

Ignorance made me  37 . I disliked wind only because it ruffled（吹亂）my hair. I hated rain merely because I had to carry an umbrella. But I had no idea at all that typhoon---something much more violent, something a thousand times more  38  than wind or rain---was a  39  to the existence of mankind.

40  no road on earth goes all the way on level ground, there’s no person in the world who can do whatever he pleases.  41  as it is for people to guard against typhoon, it is advisable for a man to stop  42  for a moment before he complains. “  43  typhoon disappeared all together? What would the world become then?” The  44  will keep him calm and lead him closer to truth---he will be better  45  of the world he lives in.

26. A. But            B. Therefore       C. Although      D. Unless

27. A. refused              B. blamed                    C. punished           D. fought

28. A. excited               B. puzzled                    C. encouraged              D. delighted

29. A. experience   B. sign                         C. sense                      D. recognition

30. A. washed              B. frightened         C. swung                     D. swept

31. A. shortage             B. supply                     C. amount                    D. waste

32. A. resource             B. power                     C. strength                   D. source

33. A. warmth              B. energy                     C. water                      D. wealth

34. A. holds          B. keeps                      C. moves                     D. depends

35. A. warmer              B. hotter                      C. cooler                     D. better

36. A. disappear            B. move                C. escape                     D. remove

37. A. farsighted            B. out of sight              C. in sight                    D. shortsighted

38. A. appealing     B. frightening               C. disturbing         D. exciting

39. A. trouble               B. danger                     C. must                D. lead

40. A. Since          B. As                           C. When                      D. While

41. A. Impossible   B. Wrong                     C. Hard                D. Easy

42. A. thinking              B. to think                    C. to rest                     D. resting

43. A. How come B. What about              C. What if                    D. Even if

44. A. theories              B. answers                   C. phenomena              D. complaints

45. A. careful               B. kind                        C. aware                      D. tired