Question

When I was seven my father gave me a Timex, my first watch. I loved it, wore it for years, and haven’t had another one since it stopped ticking a decade ago. Why? Because I don’t need one. I have a mobile phone and I’m always near someone with an iPod or something like that. All these devices(裝置)tell the time----which is why, if you look around, you’ll see lots of empty wrists; sales of watches to young adults have been going down since 2007.

This is ridiculous（荒唐的）. Expensive cars go faster than cheap cars. Expensive clothes hang better than cheap clothes. But these days all watches tell the time as well as all the other watches. Expensive watches come with extra functions----but who needs them? How often do you dive to 300 metres into the sea or need to find your direction in the area around the South Pole? So why pay that much of five years’ school fees for watches that allow you to do these things?

If justice were done, the Swiss watch industry should have closed down when the Japanese discovered how to make accurate watches for a five-pound note. Instead the Swiss reinvented the watch, with the aid of millions of pounds’ worth of advertising, as a message about the man wearing it. Rolexes are for those who spend their weekends climbing icy mountains; a Patek Philippe is for one from a rich or noble family; a Breitling suggests you like to pilot planes across the world.

Watches are now classified as “investments”(投資). A 1994 Philippe recently sold for nearly $350,000, while 1960s Rolexes have gone from $15,000 to $30,000 plus in a year. But a watch is not an investment. It’s a toy for self-satisfaction, a matter of fashion. Prices may keep going up----they’ve been rising for 15 years. But when fashion moves on, the owner of that $350,000 beauty will suddenly find his pride and joy is no more a good investment than my childhood Timex.

1.The sales of watches to young people have fallen because they_______.

A. have other devices to tell the time

B. think watches too expensive

C. prefer to wear an iPod

D. have no sense of time

2.It seems ridiculous to the writer that _______.

A. people dive 300 metres into the sea

B. expensive clothes sell better than cheap ones

C. cheap cars don’t run as fast as expensive ones

D. expensive watches with unnecessary functions still sell

3.What can be learnt about Swiss watch industry from the passage?

A. It targets rich people as its potential customers.

B. It’s hard for the industry to beat its competitors.

C. It wastes a huge amount of money in advertising.

D. It’s easy for the industry to reinvent cheap watches.

4.Which would be the best title for the passage?

A. Timex or Rolex?

B. My Childhood Timex

C. Watches? Not for Me!

D. Watches----a Valuable Collection

 

Answer 1

1.A

2.D

3.A

4.C

【解析】

試題分析：本文主要講述的很多人實(shí)際上并不需要手表。手表現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)成為了投資物品

1.細(xì)節(jié)判斷題。根據(jù)第1段All these devices tell the time …sales of watches to young adults have been going down可知面向年輕人銷(xiāo)售的手表銷(xiāo)售額下降主要是因?yàn)楹芏嘣O(shè)備都能報(bào)時(shí)。

2.細(xì)節(jié)題。根據(jù)第三段后四行Expensive watches come with extra functions—but who needs them? How often do you dive to 300 metres into the sea or need to find your direction in the area around the South Pole? So why pay that much of five years’ school fees for watches that allow you to do these things? 說(shuō)明手表實(shí)際上沒(méi)有什么用途，但是很多人都購(gòu)買(mǎi)，這真是荒謬。故D項(xiàng)內(nèi)容正確。

3.細(xì)節(jié)題。根據(jù)第四段Instead the Swiss reinvented the watch, with the aid of millions of pounds’ worth of advertising, as a message about the man wearing it. Rolexes are for those who spend their weekends climbing icy mountains; a Patek Philippe is for one from a rich or noble family; a Breitling suggests you like to pilot planes across the world. 說(shuō)明瑞士的手表經(jīng)營(yíng)商把富人當(dāng)成了自己的目標(biāo)人群，故選A項(xiàng)。

4.主旨大意題。本文講述在現(xiàn)代許多移動(dòng)設(shè)備都能報(bào)時(shí)的前提下，還花費(fèi)很多錢(qián)購(gòu)買(mǎi)名表究竟是否合適，因此選擇C“手表？我不要！”為標(biāo)題較為形象生動(dòng)也很貼切。A“天美時(shí)還是勞力士”，B“我的孩童時(shí)代的天美時(shí)”，D“手表—昂貴的選擇”都不符合文章主題

考點(diǎn)：日常生活類(lèi)閱讀。